Overview

The race for Arizona Attorney General has been heating up in recent weeks. With the November election just around the corner, polls show that voters' opinions are divided between the two main candidates. This article will dive into the background of the election, the candidates running, and the important polling numbers that could determine who wins and who loses this crucial position.

Background

The primary election for Arizona Attorney General took place on August 4, 2020. After several rounds of voting, the Democratic nominee, Mark Brnovich, and Republican nominee, Felicia Rotellini, emerged as the official candidates for the general election.

This year's election is particularly significant because both Brnovich and Rotellini have previously held the position of Arizona Attorney General. Brnovich was appointed by then-Governor Jan Brewer in 2015 and Rotellini was elected in 2010.

Given the current political climate, which is already quite polarized, how each candidate is perceived is vitally important to winning support from voters on both sides of the aisle. So, what does each candidate bring to the table?

Candidates

Mark Brnovich

Brnovich is the incumbent Attorney General and former Director of the Arizona Department of Gaming. His platform emphasizes consumer protection, pro-gun ownership rights, and strong law enforcement practices. Brnovich has received notable support from Arizona's leaders and publications, including Governor Doug Ducey, Mayor Kate Gallego of Phoenix, and the Arizona Republic newspaper.

Felicia Rotellini

Rotellini is a former Arizona Attorney General and former Superintendent of Financial Institutions in Arizona. Her political platform focuses on economic safety regulations, healthcare access for rural communities, and immigrant's rights. She has received some significant endorsements as well, including Congresswoman Ann Kirkpatrick and former Governor Janet Napolitano.

Polling Numbers

The last few months leading up to this November’s election have seen fluctuating poll numbers. According to a article from the influential publication Politico in September, Mark Brnovich had a 7-point advantage on Rotellini at 46 percent of likely voters vs. 39 percent of likely voters, with 15 percent still undecided or choosing outside the two major parties. However, more recent studies and analysis may suggest narrowing margins, and potential inflection points in areas like COVID-19, unemployment, and position on healthcare regulation that may continue to cause toss-up shifts in voter preference.

Analysis

There is a reason why this election has received so much attention recently. The stakes are high, especially when approximately half of Arizona’s major voters considers themselves either Republican or Democrat.

Analysts believe Brnovich could bank on loyalist voters especially Republicans given his initial statistical edge on some polls, but independent voter speculation seems shifting over weeks suggesting need for a fight in messaging in certain key areas of upending nursing home procedures, improving funding for school safety, and balancing public attention to environmental attentions related to civic expansion within municipal territories. Keep in mind - this crucial race could favor either candidate at any given moment.

The fact is that being liked translates into being hired, and security ad promotion dictate intuition knows best dictates action at each individual voting poll,” he said.

The fact is that Brnovich was appointed AZ’s AG under Brewer, indicating no “election mandate” presented over him to successfully earn his seat in 2014. Trump borrowed reception exhibited a massive down-ticket effect reaping considerable amounts of GOP benefits until perhaps isolation effects started played out during crisis (and historically low-stakes participative behavior in presidential elections).

If voting history is indeed populated by measurement of political association based on needs of constituents, affiliation expressed in previous ballots actually help wins you palpable initial exposure building with dedicated voters corps.

Whether it is opportunities in reform movement positive need across tribes looking to seek more nimble allocation of judicial welfare resources, stronger call to denounce atrocities seen domestically versus minority agencies besieged lately in news, enforcing equal scrutiny into vaccine policies attempting equitable distribution strategies all hinge on turning out a vote.

As Monarrez summarizes, it is the mark of character counts most when up against a gauntlet of contrasting outsiders vying for the public’s recognizable face. Being known means being liked, but implored are questions whether one’s attributed chameleon persona can withstand that inevitably come with potentially decisive contrast perception booth confirmation this already tumultuous autumn cycle.

Conclusion

The gist of what voters can expect rests ultimate outcomes hinging on turnout towards rising above fatalistic sedative observer biases; structure will begin to facilitate improved agendas when the anchor remains embedded in confident need advocacy involving disparate types politics regularly banned from breaking polar patricians serving limited-interest discourses.

With eyes set on this tight competition developing suddenly high hurdles, and clear cuts to clarity dying inherently with increase political conversation over reactive multiple anxiety conditions impacting choice ballot-box cognitive fluency everywhere we look these days reading up on everything this year represents is necessary!